for the sake of money

With the current DBSK (korean band) law suits, I cant help but feel that artistes perform for the purpose of money. True, spurred by their initial interests but how many would cont being one if there wasnt any monetary gain?

It is unfair that fans protest agst e artist's company bcoz they feel that their beloved artistes are poorly treated. How many really Do Know the inside/truth behind artistes-management contract?

As from the DBSK law suits. It arises fr the members themselves endorsing for certain goods wout going through the company's approval/knowledge. Isnt it obvious that endorsing uses celebrities' fame therefore involving company engagement. Their (DBSK) reason, "They did it to earn more $$" This brings my pt to sq one.

As fr allkpop, it was said that e members earn only 10-30% of the profits to be split among 5. Sure, at first glance anyone would think that 10% is Too little for e wk done by members themselves. but it is 10% OF A COMPANY'S PROFIT. a company. to quantify it, the amt is higher than the ave american earnings plus they dont have to pay for their own living expenses and clothes etc.

I feel that only insiders deserve to comment on e artistes-management issues. All else aside, fans should leave them alone.
'